Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Last month, the Global Legal Post reported that Swazi lawyers had geared up to stymie the probe, which they argued was unlawful.
Within the last few days, a full bench of the country’s High Court unanimously backed an application from the Law Society of Swaziland, arguing that parliament does not have the power to interfere with the judiciary or legal professions. The select committee must be stopped, and parliament will have to pay the costs incurred.
Separation of powers
According to the Times of Swaziland, Judge Nkululeko Hlophe agreed with the Law Society’s contention that the country’s Bill of Rights allows the legal profession to self-regulate. He ruled that parliament’s attempts to control lawyers overlooked the separation of the country’s legislative and judicial powers.
Judge Hlophe continued that if members of parliament are concerned about potential lawyer misconduct, they should take action through the existing regulatory structures of the Law Society.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]