Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
According to South African media portal BizCommunity, the legislation – section 46 of the penal code – was wiped from legislation with little opposition, as many agreed that the law was unnecessary.
Such was the level of support for ditching the law, that the campaign was backed by the former information minister in the Democratic Progressive Party of the late president Bingu wa Mutharika, who originally brought the law to the statute books, according to the report.
The law was a contentious issue before the death of president Mutharika in April, as media organisation and the general public appealed for it to be amended, with little success.
Henry Duncan Phoya, the lawyer leader of the house, commented that the law created a negative image of the country and provided no benefit to the government. In his submission of the new bill, Mr Phoya said: ‘Section 46 was unreasonable limitation to free publication, freedom of speech and freedom of the media.’
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]